The American legal system is facing a pivotal moment in its storied history. At a time when objectivity and impartiality should reign supreme within the halls of justice, a concerning trend of ideological poisoning threatens the bedrock principles of fairness and constitutional adherence. Jonathan Turley, a respected constitutional law professor, has stepped forward to issue a stark warning against this rising tide of partisanship which risks undermining public confidence in one of our Republic’s most crucial institutions.
Turley’s position on this matter is firmly rooted in a deep respect for the Constitution and the understanding that the judiciary must remain an apolitical bulwark against the whims of transient majorities. He elucidates the dangers of judges who stray beyond their remit to interpret the law and instead engage in the practice of crafting it to suit political or ideological ends. Such actions do not only betray the intended purpose of the judicial branch but also erode the checks and balances that are essential to a healthy democracy.
In light of this absurd civil verdict, posting this video again of Kevin O’Leary.
He explains, to CNN of all platforms:
NO ONE lost money!
Trump negotiated like EVERY real estate developer.
Total witch hunt.pic.twitter.com/O2RPUxqErQ
— Steve Cortes (@CortesSteve) February 18, 2024
This insightful legal mind has drawn attention to the historical context that illustrates the gravity of the current situation. As American jurisprudence evolved through centuries, steadfast adherence to the Constitution has been its guiding star. Disturbingly, some of today’s legal scholars and appointed judges appear to be navigating by a different constellation—one that aligns with activist agendas rather than the enduring principles set forth by the nation’s Founders.
An encroaching ideology into areas of law such as freedom of speech, gun rights, and religious liberty is being observed with increasing unease. Activist judges chip away at these cornerstones with their rulings, dictated by personal belief systems rather than the letter of the law. This judicial activism creates a domino effect, as flawed precedents pave the way for future decisions that stray further from constitutional constructs.
BUT THEY GO AFTER A INNOCENT MAN PRESIDENT TRUMP😡🇺🇸WITCH HUNT AGAINST A POLITICAL OPPONENT😡🇺🇸😡🇺🇸😡🇺🇸😡🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/4vouJtFTcX
— 🇺🇸Nicky King🇺🇸 (@NickyK1776) February 23, 2024
The implications of such a trend are profound, with every citizen standing to lose an impartial arbiter in affairs of societal and personal import. When judges adopt the role of part-time legislators, it diminishes the representative power of the populace, and legislation from the bench becomes a shadow government that operates outside of electoral accountability. The Republic is designed so that legislative power—deriving its authority from the people—lies with elected officials who are accountable to their constituents, not with an unelected judiciary whose power comes from legal scholarship and judicial temperament.
Professor Turley calls for a renewed commitment to judicial restraint, an approach that honors the original text and intent of the Constitution. Such restraint fosters a predictable and stable legal environment, essential for a society where citizens are able to foresee the legal consequences of their actions. The predictability that comes from faithful constitutional adherence is a pillar of the rule of law and a cornerstone of American freedom.
Turley’s warning is not without solutions. He encourages the appointment of judges who are known for their restraint and fidelity to the Constitution, regardless of which political party sits in power. This is a matter of American principle, not partisan gain. He also advocates for the legal community and the public at large to uphold the principles of constitutional literacy, ensuring that citizens understand the framework of their governance and the reasons behind the necessity of a neutral judiciary.
In conclusion, the weight of Jonathan Turley’s words should not be taken lightly. It serves as a clarion call to those who value the principles of constitutional governance. It reminds us that while the political landscape may shift with the seasons, the administration of justice must remain rooted in unmovable ground. As citizens of this great Republic, we must be vigilant, promoting judiciousness in our judiciary, thereby preserving the ideals of justice, equity, and liberty for all.
