Arizona Governor’s Veto of Bipartisan Bill Sparks Outrage: State’s Troubling Shift Towards Lawlessness


In recent news, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs has once again proven her disregard for law and order by vetoing a crucial bipartisan bill. This decision has sparked outrage among conservative voices, who view it as yet another example of the state's descent into lawlessness. As a conservative writer, it is my duty to shed light on this concerning issue and provide a perspective that is often ignored in mainstream media.

At the heart of the matter lies Hobbs' veto of a bill that aimed to curb the growing threat of lawlessness in Arizona. This bill, backed by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, sought to enforce stricter penalties for crimes such as rioting and destruction of public property. However, Hobbs saw fit to reject this legislation, citing concerns over potential infringements on First Amendment rights. This, of course, is nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to appease the radical left and undermine the safety and security of Arizona citizens.

But this veto is not an isolated incident. It is just the latest in a series of actions by Hobbs that have emboldened lawlessness in Arizona. Under her leadership, the state has become a haven for violent protesters and criminals, while law-abiding citizens are left to fend for themselves. This cannot continue if we want to maintain any semblance of order and stability in our communities.

What is even more concerning is the blatant disregard for the bipartisan nature of the bill. In a time where political division runs rampant, the fact that lawmakers from both sides of the aisle could come together to address a pressing issue should be applauded. Yet, Hobbs chose to ignore this unity and prioritize her own political agenda over the safety and well-being of Arizona residents.

But this is not just a matter of political posturing. The consequences of Hobbs' actions are very real and affect all Arizonans. We have already seen the devastating effects of unchecked lawlessness in other states, and it is only a matter of time before it reaches our own backyard. This veto sends a dangerous message that lawlessness will not only be tolerated but also protected in Arizona.

Some may argue that Hobbs' decision is a necessary safeguard for protecting freedom of speech and expression. However, let's not forget that these rights do not give anyone the right to cause harm or destruction. It is a slippery slope when we allow criminals to hide behind the First Amendment, using it as a shield to justify their violent actions. This is not about silencing voices, but about maintaining law and order in a civil society.

In conclusion, Governor Hobbs' veto of the bipartisan bill is just another example of her blatant disregard for the rule of law. It is a dangerous trend that must be addressed before it's too late.

As a conservative, I urge all Arizonans to stand up against this lawlessness and demand accountability from our leaders. We must not let our state fall victim to the same chaos and destruction that has plagued others. It's time for action, before it's too late.

What are YOUR thoughts on Katie Hobbs?

We want to hear from you! Please comment below to join the discussion.


  1. She needs to be removed. She’s not for law and order, Arizona, or bipartisan action. She’s only in it for herself and stole the election

  2. Just another commie running the state. We know the governor election was rigged just like Trumps. People in Arizona better wake up. They will become California πŸ‘ŽπŸ‘Ž

  3. hobbs is following the deep state agenda. you can read it in the cloward piven strategy and also saul alyinsky’s rules for radicals. it spell it out very clear. also read agenda 21 and 2030.
    remember, you cant have a great reset unless you break the current system first.

    • Do you mean that there’s a book called agenda 2030? I’ve read agenda 21 but didn’t even know there was another book of the same kind.

  4. She was “elected” following many documented, but un-investigated oddities in the electoral process. So like our resident at 1600, you get what was allowed into power. POWER being the main objective

  5. I bet she was 100% opposite on the January 6th people. Dual rights in America, those on the right have very narrow scope of rights. Those on the left have a wider range of rights, under the same exact laws.

  6. She is not going by the Constitution which states clearly that only legal citizens are allowed to vote in our elections. She nor anyone else have the legal right to go against the Constitution. She should be removed from office immediately and charges filed against her if she allows illegals to vote. Proof of citizenship is the only way to make sure no illegals will vote.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here